You're currently browsing the February 29th, 2008 archive

Paris Hilton Gives Dogs Away, Investigated by US Animal Welfare Services

Published: Feb 29th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Hard to believe, I know, but apparently Paris Hilton has taken her ‘fancy’ for dogs to excessive levels and has broken a Los Angeles animal law.

It is reported that the hotel heiress who is often photographed carrying a chihuahua, has a few too many dogs - 7 too many to be exact - and has had to give some away following a visit from a member of the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services.

Hilton is quoted:

“I only have 10 dogs now. Some of my dogs had puppies, so I gave some of them away to people I really know and trust. I gave some to my stylist and to a few of my best friends, so now I’m down to 10.”

She recently admitted to having 17 dogs which is a breach of Los Angeles law that prohibits non breeders from having more than 3 dogs at one address.

ShareThis

Maniac Rottweiler Killer Gets 5 Months

Published: Feb 29th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

If ever there needed to be a clearer message that some people should not be dog owners, this is it.

A dog killer has been jailed for butchering his Rottweiler in the shower with a sword.

Andrew Davis, 47, launched the savage attack after his pet Roxy bit a child.

The dog died slowly and in “excruciating pain” despite being fed half a bottle of wine and painkillers.
advertisement

After the attack Davis told police the dog turned and looked at him as if to say: “Daddy, why did you do that?”

Brighton magistrates were told the stabbing was so ferocious that the tip of the ornamental sword was blunted.

As blood pumped from her wounds Davis stabbed the animal again and again until she died.

He then wrapped her lifeless body in a blanket and put it in the back of his van.

He was about to drive it away to bury it when police officers alerted by neighbours arrived.

They discovered a trail of blood where he had dragged the heavy dog’s body from the shower.

Davis, of Brunswick Road West, Hove, was yesterday jailed for five months after admitting animal cruelty.

He is already serving a two-and-half-year sentence for grievous bodily harm after he stabbed a man last year and for intimidating witnesses.

He will have to serve the five months for killing his dog at the end of that sentence.

Davis was also banned from keeping animals for life and will have wait at least ten years before he can apply to get the ban lifted.

David Buck, prosecuting, told magistrates Davis and Roxy were at the Kings House pub, London Road, Burgess Hill, on July 4. (07) Shelley Tucker later told police the black and tan Rottweiler bit her eight-year-old son Kyle on the arm causing it to bleed slightly.

She said Davis asked her if Kyle was alright and as she left she saw Davis punching the dog hard on the nose.

Mr Buck said police were called by Davis’ neighbours at 3am the next day complaining they could smell petrol coming from Davis’ flat and saying they were concerned about his dog.

He told officers he had spilled petrol while filling his motorbike and the dog was staying with friends.

They left but returned a short time later after receiving more calls from worried neighbours.

They discovered her blood soaked body in the back of his white VW van in the basement car park below his home.

Davis told them he decided to kill the animal after it had bitten a child for the third time.

He said he had fed Roxy a cocktail of crushed up biscuits and painkillers in half a bottle of wine to make her go to sleep.

When that failed to work he put her in the shower and soaked one of her toys in petrol in the hope that the fumes would knock her out.

He thought she had gone to sleep when he thrust the sword into her heart, but she yelped with pain.

A vet who examined her body said the attempts to knock the dog out first would only have made her distressed and confused.

Mr Buck added: “The dog would have felt every blow and the injuries to her heart and lungs would have been exruciatingly painful.

“One of the wounds went right through her chest and others were more than three inches deep.

“The vet concluded that the dog had been subjected to a frenzied attack.

“Under no circumstances can this method of killing an animal be described as humane.”

Peter Green, defending, said Davis “loved his dog” and had owned her for seven months.

Read the full story here

Time for a dog owner suitability test, now.

Time for us to introduce tougher prison terms for animal abusers.

Time for us to remember, it is far more common that it is people, not dogs, who are responsible for sickening, pre-meditated acts of inhumane violence.

ShareThis

Torchwood Star John Barrowman Announces Addition to his Family

Published: Feb 29th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Torchwood star and West End performer John Barrowman has welcomed a new friend into his life.

The actor and singer has re-homed a Jack Russell Terrier from Cardiff Dogs Home.

John Barrrowman fell in love with the 12 week old pup who staff had named ‘Captain Jack’ whilst opening a new kennel block at Cardiff Dogs Home.

John Barrowman and Captain Jack

The Jack Russell Terrier had been found abandoned recently in a Cardiff flat and was being cared for by staff at the Dogs Home.

Accompanied by Captain Jack John Barrowman officially opened the four new kennels at the Dogs Home which have been built to house larger dogs and mothers with pups.

Councillor Judith Woodman, Cardiff Council Deputy Leader said:

“Cardiff Council is very grateful for the support of John Barrowman who has visited the Dogs Home to officially open a new kennel block. The new kennels have been converted from an old derelict building and were made possible by donations from two kind benefactors who bequeathed money to the Dogs Home last year.”

“Around 1300 abandoned and stray dogs pass through Cardiff Dogs Home each year. The new kennels will be used to house bigger dogs and for nursing mothers with pups. The donations have also helped to pay for the refurbishment of a vet’s room so that spaying and castration can now be carried out on site.”

John Barrowman said: “I was pleased to be invited to Cardiff Dogs Home to support all the good work that it does for abandoned and stray dogs throughout the city. As a dog owner and Patron of the Dogs Trust myself
I know how important it is to pass on the message of responsible dog ownership to all dog owners.”

During my visit to the Dogs’ Home I fell in love with a 12 week old Jack Russell Terrier who was recently abandoned in an empty flat in Cardiff. I have now adopted the little fella ‘Captain Jack’ as part of our
family.”

ShareThis

I Find Dead People - A Day in the Life of a Human Remains (Cadaver) Detection Dog

Published: Feb 28th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

As many will have heard in the news recently, the police are deploying the skills of specially trained dogs in the hunt for human remains at a former children’s home on the island of Jersey. Dogs have also been used in the recent high profile searches for missing girl Madeleine McCann and West Yorkshire schoolgirl Shannon Matthews. If you’ve ever wondered how these specialist sniffer dogs are trained or how they go about their work, K9 Magazine spoke with PC David King about what goes into training and working a cadaver dog.

 

This Article Appeared In K9 Magazine Issue 5 - View A PDF Version Of This Article >>

 

It is not until you actually own a dog is it that you realise just how strong the canine sense of smell is. I always knew that dogs could find us before we could find them, but as a dry nosed amateur, I did not fully appreciate the extent of their ability until I learned about human remains detection dogs.

 

 

For centuries, dogs have assisted members of the Police force with such diverse jobs as detecting explosives, crowd control, detecting narcotics and physically apprehending criminals. But up until relatively recently human remains detection, or cadaver dogs and their human colleagues have been an under represented minority in the field of canine related police work.

 

The common misconception has been for a while that cadaver dogs do not assist in crime prevention, they only assist in the collection of evidence. Although this is technically true, the life changing capabilities of these remarkable dogs are unequivocally staggering, as I was about to find out.

 

A chilly, January afternoon in Hutton, Lancashire was the setting and Police Constable David King was my host.  Meeting David, a serving officer since 1981 with over seven years experience with Police dogs, four of which specifically with cadaver dogs, was one of those experiences where all of your preconceptions are blown out of the water.

 

It was one of those times where someone’s face could be no further from the image conjured up by the preceding telephone conversations, and to add a dash of surrealism, I was to be interviewing a police officer, something which half tempted me to use phrases like ‘for the benefit of the tape’ and ‘interview terminated at fifteen hundred hours’.

 

I decided not to upon being shown to the room where PC King was waiting for me. You see, David was not the ‘Reg Hollis off the Bill’ type bumbling stereotype his telephone demeanour had suggested, he was in fact a man mountain who’s very presence seemed to command respect from his peers at the station and from anything on four legs within a square mile, add to this the fact that upon shaking his hand I realised that I was about to speak to a very, very strong man. 

 

I spoke to PC King about many things canine related, including drugs, toys and death. Here is how it unfolded.

 

K9. How did you arrive at this vocation?

 

DK. I became a police officer in1981, and went on to serve in various parts of the constabulary. I really enjoyed working in uniform, but after about ten years I decided that I wanted to specialise. I wanted to remain in uniform so I became a Police Dog handler.

 

K9. So you carry out traditional Police duties as well?

 

DK. Not anymore. My core task is dog training and instructing the dogs when searching for human remains.

 

K9. Do you consider yourself a Police officer who works with dogs, or a dog handler who works for the Police?

 

DK. (laughs.) You’ll get me into trouble with that one. No, the force ethos is that you are Police officers who work with dogs, but the reality for most dog handlers including myself is that you are definitely dog handlers first, who work for the Police.

 

K9. What is the best breed of dog for this type of work and why?

 

DK. We tend to use gun dog breeds for most work requiring a specialised dog. This includes cadaver dogs, but they are also excellent for detecting explosives and drugs. The reason for that is that Labradors and Spaniels represent a large portion of all dogs that are bred for work, and as such they tend to have better natural abilities.

 

K9. Given the sensitive nature of the work, are there any special qualities you look for when selecting dogs to work with?

 

DK. Ultimately the dogs have to be hard working dogs, that are willing to retrieve. But not special in the respect that we worry what people think about them, that is immaterial to us. It is pretty much the same criteria we require for dogs that search for explosives, we need highly motivated dogs that like to play.

 

K9. Do you train the dogs to be passive or active? (Passive dogs lay down to signal a find, active dogs dig when they have a find)

 

DK. My current dog (Missy, an extremely affable Golden Retriever) is trained as an active dog. Her reward when she has a find is food. If I was to train another human remains dog today the reward I would use would be a toy rather than food, simply because of past experiences I have had.

 

K9. Narcotics dogs are trained with pseudo-narcotics, what do you use to simulate human remains?

 

DK. Well firstly, we actually use real drugs to train with now. With regards to the human remains training we use a cadaverous pig. A dead pig is the closest you will get to a dead human

 

K9. What is the protocol when a person is missing feared dead, how do things unfold.

 

DK. My main job is training, and I do that during the week. The dogs are worth nothing to me if I can’t train them. So searches usually happen at the weekend. Although it sounds insensitive, it is not a matter of urgency, although the Police usually want everything done yesterday

 

K9. Obviously it is a distressing experience when the dog has a find how do you praise or reward the dog in this situation ?

 

DK. Although I am concerned about the job that I am doing and what it means to people, and I have feelings myself, I view all searches as training for my dog. You’ve got to be professional. One thing to remember is that the searches are almost always done away from the public eye, to protect the feelings of the people involved. But when Missy does have a find, it is imperative that I remain professional and give her praise in the usual way, which is lots of hand contact and verbal praise when she signals.

 

K9. Do the dogs pick up on any emotion involved?

 

DK. As soon as Missy signals a find, I move her away from the respective areas involved and go on to conduct the investigation with her out of the way. That is the only way you can do it.

 

K9. Your job is one of contrast. You have the pleasure of working with the dogs you have spent a long time training, but you also have to deal with the less than pleasant issue of dead bodies. Does one cancel out the other?

 

DK. No. Although it is very distressing, the majority of the time I am searching for people who have been murdered. There are also people who have gone missing, and quite a lot of times, I am searching for elderly people who have simply got lost on their own and succumbed to cold or fallen down. I always see it as allowing people who are related to the deceased to have closure. If it is murder, it allows us to continue the investigation, if it is a missing person, it finally allows people to grieve and say that that person is gone. That in itself gives me a degree of pleasure. I am able to let people carry on living their lives, whereas beforehand they would not have been able to do so.

 

K9. How do switch off from work when you get home?

 

DK. Again it comes down to experience of being a Police officer. You see a lot of things that upset you, not just death. You have to maintain a degree of distance. You cannot allow yourself to be affected. But then again, the Police force is changing. There have been situations where I have seen something that has caused me a great deal of concern, and the Police are now quite happy to assist with de-briefings and the like, even psychological assistance is commonplace to enable officers to get over something that has traumatised them.

 

K9. Does the nature of the job have any adverse affects on your life outside of your job?

 

DK. (emphatically.) No.

 

K9. What goes through your mind when the dog begins to signal that she has a find?

 

DK. The initial thought that goes through my mind is ‘Great, I’ve got a find’, Simple as that. Although it is a delicate thing that I’m searching for, I am still a dog handler and I’m getting a result. Which is the reason that I’m there.

 

 

After the interview David took me out to meet Missy. She was in a pen at the other end of the row of kennels. One thing I noticed was that every single dog in between David and Missy was deliriously excited by David’s presence. It was like a reverse domino rally as I watched each dog spring up in turn as David walked past them, politely acknowledging their presence.

 

Missy was as excited as any body else in David’s presence and she soon demonstrated to everyone present exactly how well trained she was. As we walked with her David explained some of the science behind human remains detection.

 

DK. When a person dies, the body automatically begins decomposing. The rate of decomposition depends on the conditions. If a body is buried it will be slower than if it were in the sun. If it is mummified, the process will be even slower as the covered body will be less susceptible to the decline induced by heat, or the presence of insects.

 

K9. What is it exactly that the dogs trace?

 

DK. The decomposing body is liquefied from the inside, by enzymes in the muscle tissue. This causes the body to swell, and give of the gas Hydrogen Sulphide. This what the dog will pick up on. There is H2S, present elsewhere in the atmosphere, which is why we use the pig. So that the gas is not taken in isolation and the dog is more familiar with what it should be seeking.



ShareThis

Assistance Dogs to Help Children With Autism - New Initiative Launched

Published: Feb 28th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Sheffield based Support Dogs, one of the UK’s leading charities dedicated to training assistance dogs, has today launched a £1 million appeal to help it to introduce a unique national initiative to provide dogs specially trained to help children with Autism.

autism-assistance-dogs.jpg

This programme is the first of its kind in mainland UK and over the next four years, if it reaches its £1 million target, the charity will be able to help hundreds of people affected by Autism.

Support Dogs has already trained the UK’s first Autism Assistance Dog with the support of Irish Guide Dogs, which has run a successful programme in Ireland for over three years. Lacey (a yellow Labrador) has been partnered with Paula Craik and her 5 year old son Joe (who live in Dundee) and in the last year has made a tremendous difference to their lives. Following on from this success, the charity now plans to make this life changing initiative available to families across the UK.

It is estimated that over 500,000 people in the UK are affected by Autism, a lifelong developmental disability that affects the way a person communicates and relates to the people around them. Over 72,000 of these are children between the ages of three and 10 years old who could benefit from a specially trained Autism Assistance Dog.

Angela Gregory, Support Dogs’ Marketing and Fundraising Officer, says:” We are very excited to be able to announce the launch of the first national Autism Assistance Dogs initiative in the UK.

“We have set ourselves an extremely ambitious target of £1 million, to fund the first four years of the programme, but achieving this will allow us to provide a truly inclusive national service with no regional restrictions, which will see us training 40 dogs every year by 2012.

“By the end of the first four years we will have trained 68 dogs, helped an estimated 300 people and have four fully qualified full time Autism Assistance Dog trainers.”

Autism Assistance Dogs make a real and very positive difference to the lives of children with Autism and their families and the work by Irish Guide Dogs has already  identified a number of direct benefits:

·        Improved safety levels for children with autism through control of the child by commanding the dog which acts as an anchor.

·        Improved behaviour and socialisation skills through acting as a constant companion and forming a unique bond.

·        Creates freedom for the child and family to go out from the home, allowing full public access – shops, restaurants, hotels and schools.

·        Expands the child’s capabilities to experience more from life.

·        Calms the child thereby increasing attention span and improving aptitude for learning.

·        Reduces stress for all family members.

·        Teaches the child responsibilities.

·        Positive changes in behaviour, lower aggression level and comfort when upset.

Angela adds: “We are very grateful for the support that Irish Guide Dogs has given us. Their willingness to share their expertise has been absolutely fantastic and we hope to work with them even more closely in the future.”

Support Dogs’ is also the only charity in the UK to train Seizure Alert Dogs and it is the experience, gained through training these very specialised partnerships, that is invaluable to the training of Autism Assistance Dogs.

Rita Howson, Support Dogs’ Head of Training, explains: “Every partnership between a Seizure Alert Dog and its owner is unique. The dogs have to be trained to recognised very individual signs that their owner is about to have a seizure, because no two cases of epilepsy are the same. This is also true for Autism so the dog has to be trained to form a very close and intuitive bond with the child

“In our opinion this experience puts Support Dogs in a unique position to move into the field of Autism Assistance Dogs.

The Autism Assistance Dogs programme is totally free of charge to all applicants however Support Dogs receives no government funding and relies on donations and bequests to fund its life transforming work.

Support Dogs will be at Crufts at the NEC, Birmingham 6th – 9th March 2008 (Hall 2 Stand 62) for enquiries and to accept donations to the Autism Assistance Appeal.

The Autism Assistance Dogs enquiry line will be available from Monday 10th March 2008 on: 0114 2617800. For more information about Support Dogs visit: www.support-dogs.org.uk .

ShareThis

Assistance Dogs Flying High

Published: Feb 28th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Canine Partner Endal Arguably now one of the most famous assistance dogs in the world and his human partner Gulf war veteran Allen Parton broke another personal record by taking their fiftieth flight together with British airways on Monday The event was made that bit more unusual as at their side, at 32,00ft was Canine Partners golden retriever Ikea, one of the charity’s demo dogs, owned by Allen’s wife Sandra Parton.

Assistance dogs are now allowed to travel comfortably in the cabins of aircraft now which removes the need for sedation and crating in an aircraft hold. Normally only one dog per flight is allowed but as Endal and Ikea live and work together they were permitted to fly on the same aircraft.

Both dogs were given two complementary seat spaces, so they were able to stretch out in relative comfort, Endal sleeping all the way, except when the lunch was been served. Allen says it is so funny to see the differences in the two breeds, Endal looks out of the aircraft window and sees a cloud and you can see his brain thinking “can I chase it”..Ikea on the other hand looks out and sees the cloud and thinks is it going to crash into us …he really is a little worrier.

Allen was accompanying his wife Sandra, Canine Partner’s puppy operations manager, on a visit to Canine Partners puppy satellite in Scotland, 30 miles north of Dundee. The flight coming in to Edinburgh was extremely rough because of extreme gales “said Allen” and the announcement from the flight deck really summed it all up… “we hope the landing was as interesting for you as it was for us on the flight deck up front?”. You can’t explain to the dogs what is happening during a flight but they both behaved impeccably despite the buffering they had to endure. The British airways cabin crew really went out of their way to ensure that both Endal and Ikea were comfortable through out their flights and ice cubes and water provided (plus the odd half a sandwich).

“Our fellow passengers, especially the children, were really amazed to see the two dogs getting on to the aircraft” said Allen “and I think Endal and Ikea caused a delay in the turn a round as during disembarkation everyone wanted to pet and say hello to them on arrival at our destination.

2008 is being celebrated as the year of the assistance dog and canine partners and the other assistance dog organization are planning various events to recognise and raise awareness of the work these amazing dogs carry out. Allen said faithfully Endal has been working at my side for 12 years now and the partnership has only been as successful as it is because of the help and assistance given to them by a very special group of people of which he includes the staff of British airways. “The skies really have no limits for for Endal and I” says Allen

Allen and Endal are now preparing to attend Crufts for their eleventh time next week

Picture Allen Endal Ikea Sandra and the British Airways flight crew

ShareThis

An Open Letter to the Kennel Club: Simply Saying You are ‘Deed not Breed’ is not Enough. It’s Time to PROVE it!

Published: Feb 28th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Just over two weeks ago I wrote an article about the Kennel Clubs plans to hold a breed identification course for vets and behaviourists consisting of just four hours training on the subject. Questions raised went unanswered and prompted a second article a week later; after the course had taken place. Despite posing 11 questions in an easy to read format that simply required a straightforward “Yes” or “No” and requesting a comment from the Kennel club, no answers have been given.

The Kennel Club did however supply a comment  (failing to answer a single question) from Caroline Kisko, Kennel Club Secretary that said,

“The KC is extremely saddened that despite all the lobbying it leads against BSL across the UK, the funding it provided for leading canine defence solicitor Trevor Cooper to defend the dogs taken in the Liverpool amnesty and all the support it has given to BSL groups such as Deed Not Breed, it is being accused of ’signing dogs death warrants’”.

This sounds like a valid point doesn’t it? However when you actually take it apart and look at the bare bones, it doesn’t seem quite so valid to me.

The Kennel Club is a pretty powerful group. Somehow they managed to convince those in parliament that the voice of the un-elected Kennel Club is the voice of the dog owning public.  As such they do get listened to unlike us mere dog-owning mortals. So lets take a look at

“all the lobbying it leads against BSL across the UK”

Recently we saw the Kennel Club’s press release on the Scottish Control of Dogs proposal, which states:

“the Kennel Club understands that it would not be practical in the current political climate to remove the list of banned breeds from Section 1 of the current Act”

They do? I don’t! It’s unworkable, unenforceable, costly and does not protect the public. The Kennel Club claim to agree with those points yet they refuse to say, “It’s wrong, it doesn’t work, we need it repealed and we need to concentrate on truly protecting the public”.  Refusing for any reason to demand BSL is removed is certainly not “lobbying against BSL”

Then there’s the Dangerous Dogs Act Study Group (DDASG) who have been around a few years now for whom the Kennel club is secretariat. They have drawn up a Control of Dogs act of which the Scottish proposal appears to be a direct copy of.

The objective of that proposal is:

To better protect the public without compromising dogs’ welfare by the

introduction of a ‘Control of Dogs Act’ to incorporate the better aspects

of the Dogs Act 1871 and the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 as amended but

ultimately repeal them, as they are widely criticised for their

deficiencies.

So like me, you think this means BSL is removed right? Thats what Repeal means after all. WRONG! The proposal goes on to state that it will:

Retain the offence to possess or advertise a restricted type of dog (e.g.

currently the pit bull terrier type dog) unless the dog in question is registered

on the Index of Exempted Dogs, and re-open the Index to owner led

applications provided it can be shown on the balance of probability the dog is

not a danger to public safety.

In other words, BSL is the same but if you can prove your dogs nice tempered you can keep it as per the restrictions, which include always on lead and muzzled in public and to be neutered.  However that doesn’t help the probably thousands of owners with crossbreed dogs who may grow up to be a little to tall or muscular. Will they then be seized? Really for this article, that doesn’t actually matter or the fine point problems of the proposal. Do you class this as “lobbying against BSL”? I don’t.

I have seen many a press release each time a story appears in the paper with the Kennel club requesting for no more breeds to be added to the already banned breeds. I also see them asking for the register to be reopened to allow owners to force their dogs to a life on a lead. What I cannot see in ANY of their press releases containing the words “dangerous dogs” currently on their website,  is the Kennel Club demanding BSL is removed. So the lobbying doesn’t seem that brilliant to me!

Then you have the “Experts” being trained up to identify dogs and its no wonder no one has much faith left in the Kennel Clubs “Lobbying against BSL”

Moving on to

“the funding it provided for leading canine defence solicitor Trevor Cooper to defend the dogs taken in the Liverpool amnesty”

In the last year they did pay for Trevor Cooper to help a few of the owners caught up in the Merseyside amnesty. My understanding is they paid for three days in total.  However as the court cases continued, the Kennel Club didn’t. Groups like Deed Not Breed have fought consistently for over a year to ensure that those who needed help got it. Their legal fund is reliant on donations from the public and not a penny has been received to my knowledge from the Kennel Club. So yes, they helped with three days of cases out of goodness knows how many. At a guess I’d say that there’s been in the region of 70 or more cases they haven’t helped.  So to be very correct maybe Ms Kisko should have said:

“the funding it provided for leading canine defence solicitor Trevor Cooper to defend a few of the dogs taken in the Liverpool amnesty”

And Finally we have all the support it has given to BSL groups such as Deed Not Breed,

Maybe the Kennel Club has supported Deed Not Breed but the work done by that group has been down to the hard work of those in Deed Not Breed and them alone. Apart from a spot or two at Crufts and the fact that the Kennel Club is mentioned on the paperwork for Deed not Breed I see little other evidence of the Kennel Clubs support.

If the Kennel Club truly want to be seen as doing “all the lobbying” it claims it does and to be beleived when it claims to be anti BSL maybe now would be a good time to stand up and demand the removal of all BSL.

For the record, I haven’t bothered sending a copy of this to the Kennel Club for two reasons. First, this is my opinion based on what I see. Second, as we saw last time, they don’t answer your questions! The Kennel Club are more than welcome to comment using the reply function at the bottom of the page, just like everyone else.

ShareThis

Dog Wardens Hit Out at Dogs Trust ‘Spin’

Published: Feb 27th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

By Sue Bell, NDWA President

We’re really concerned that this removal of the police from the equation completely is going to end up with a lot of stray dogs running around Chris Lawrence, the Dogs Trust

The above quote is taken from a BBC article that screams in its title: ‘Councils ‘not ready’ for strays’ referring to the fact that from the 6th of April this year Local Authorities in the UK will become the only service with a responsibility for dealing with stray dogs, as on that date Police responsibility to accept strays taken to police stations by the public will end.

While Local Authorities have had a statutory duty to deal with stray dogs since the implementation of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, The requirement that the Police accept stray dogs from the public is much older and given in the Dogs Act 1906. With both pieces of legislation in place, there were two organisations that had a statutory responsibility to deal with stray dogs and adequate 24 hour cover was generally accessible .

Angry Dog Wardens have contacted the National Dog Warden Association to express their disbelief at the comments made on behalf of the Dog’s Trust, as it is well known that this charity along with other well known dog related organisations, including the RSPCA and Kennel Club, were consulted by DEFRA on this so called transfer of responsibilities before it was introduced by Section 68 of the Clean Neighbourhoods & Environment Act 2005 - and did not object to it.

Mr Laurence further states:

‘Our worry is that it’s going to be pretty much a disaster for the first few months.’

‘We’re really concerned that this removal of the police from the equation completely is going to end up with a lot of stray dogs running around, nobody to pick them up, nobody to care for them.’

Local authorities do pick up and care for stray dogs during the day and some also do so during the evenings, but have neither the funding or capacity to extend these services to provide 24/7/365 cover and the reason that a potential disaster is fast approaching is due to the poorly thought out legislative implementation of Section 68.

DEFRA’s guidance for the change only states that councils accept dogs ‘out of hours’ ‘where practicable’ and further states that there is no need for a dog capture or collection service only the provision of an ‘acceptance point’ or points to which the public can take stray dogs.

The DEFRA guidance on dealing with stray dogs out of hours caused dismay amongst Dog Warden’s and some Councils when it first came out.

There is documentary evidence in the form of news items on the NDWA website as well as documents and discussion papers that NDWA has put forward, but sadly without the ‘clout’ that some wealthy animal welfare charities have.

NDWA was then and remains now opposed to ‘acceptance points’ due to the issue of liability, what happens when the finder of a dog is told by the ‘council’ to take it to their local ‘acceptance point’ and it attacks them or causes damage to the finders vehicle? As the council, as opposed to the law, told the person to take the dog to a certain location, will the council not be liable?

Mr Laurence sits on a number of the consulted bodies that advise government on diverse matters canine; was he unable to convince them that a badly funded, non statutory out of hours ‘acceptance’ of stray dogs ‘where practical’ was most certainly not the way forward when trying to replace the existing system which, at least, clearly directed the public (nationwide) to take any stray dog they found to a Police Station?

There are members of NDWA who are absolutely furious at this attempt by the Dogs Trust’s spokeman at spin on a problem that he and his organisation helped create themselves?

The ACPO spokesperson says:

‘stray dogs are essentially an environmental and public health issue which in modern times should not remain as a function of the police.’

However, when stray dogs are chasing livestock, that remains a police matter, when stray dogs are attacking people in the street that remains a police matter, when stray dogs are wandering on to roads and causing traffic hold ups or even accidents that remains a police matter.

The police have been eager for years to be rid of dealing with stray dogs and many forces quickly got rid of their kennels at their police stations, but in doing so they seemed to have forgotten about what do they do when they arrest somebody with a dog or dogs.That is nothing to do with the local council; the police still need kennels for prisoner dogs and many other situations where they may need to secure a dog for a couple of hours whilst they sort out a situation.

DEFRA and their advisors had plenty of opportunity to introduce a system for dealing with stray dogs that was fit for purpose for the 21st century, unfortunately it will be more likely, fit for the 19th century.; but please don’t blame the councils or their Dog Wardens, blame the government , their civil servants and their advisors for this impending ’disaster’ as either leaving the status quo or realising in advance the size of funding and type of service necessary to be created to improve on it might have prevented this situation.

ShareThis

‘Devil Dog’ in Firestorm - But all is not as it may seem for this Rottweiler

Published: Feb 27th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

Wait a rootin tootin second. Aren’t Rottweilers meant to be out eating people and terrorising local communities all over the world? What’s going on here then? A Rottweiler, saving a person’s life. Surely there must be some mistake? Oh, no. Wait. THESE are just the type of stories you won’t read about in the tabloids. Well done to This is Lancashire for covering this and well done to Lennox the life saving (yes, SAVING) Rottweiler who proves that the deed is always more important than the breed…

Rottweiler Saves Owner from Blaze.

A recent article featured online for This is Lancashire shows that it truly is the DEED and not the BREED that defines the qualities of a dog.

Reporter Ben Briggs, tells how a teenager knocked unconscious during a blaze at a relative’s home, owes his life to his pet Rottweiler, Lennox.

The blaze occurred after Mr McMahon returned from a night out and attempted to cook himself some food. He later noticed smoke pouring from the kitchen and when he went to investigate, a blast from the cooker knocked him unconscious.  The article says that Mr McMahon’s two sisters and their children where also in the building at the time but where alerted by the fire alarm and managed to get to safety. Both Mr McMahon and hero Lennox are fully recovered from their ordeal.

Owner Carl McMahon told This is Lancashire reporter Ben Briggs that

“If it wasn’t for Lennox and the firemen I would probably be dead. He stayed next to me and was yelping.”

“It was that noise that led firefighters to find me and they dragged me out.”

“The last thing I remember was the cooker blowing up and then waking up in the back of the ambulance.”

After writing about so many negative things in recent weeks it is nice to see a story in the media that includes the word “Rottweiler” without pairing it up with “Devil Dog” or similar . It is clear that Mr McMahons dog played a part in getting him to safety. In such a frightening scenario it shows just how strong a bond between a dog and his owner can be.

This is Lancashire should be commended for printing a story that could so easily have been ignored.

Maybe we need a “Hall of Fame” for reporters like Ben Briggs who can see past the breed and find a true hero.

ShareThis

Delight as Dog Reunited With Owners After Going Missing for 7 Weeks

Published: Feb 27th, 2008 | Author: admin Add Comment

A friendly little Jack Russell terrier has been reunited with her delighted owners after going missing for seven weeks.

Nine-year-old Lucy had been reported stolen from Farley Mount on January 4 and suddenly turned up at Marchwood last Friday (Feb 22).

Her owners Alan and Adrianne Howarth from Hursley Road at Chandler’s Ford were overjoyed when they received a telephone call from New Forest District Council dog warden, Neil Burton, saying she was safe and well.

“I couldn’t believe it when Alan answered the phone and we discovered Lucy had been found. We had given up,” said Mrs Howarth.

Husband Alan commented: “She disappeared when she was being taken for a walk by my stepson at Farley Mount and when he drove around looking for her someone said they had seen her being put into a white van.”

They went to the police to report her being stolen and were referred to their local Winchester City Council dog warden service who registered her on the pet log micro chip data base.

Nothing was heard for seven weeks until last Friday when she was picked up in Normandy Way at Marchwood and taken to Hythe Police station who contacted dog warden, Neil Burton. Neil scanned Lucy for a microchip and discovered that she had been stolen on the 4th January 2008 from Farley Mount.

He  then contacted her owners and arranged for them to meet at the council offices at Appletree Court, Lyndhurst where, in less than an hour, Lucy and her owners were reunited. They had taken her on 18 months earlier as a favour to her previous owner and Mr Howarth said: “She is very much part of our family now.”

Lucy’s return was the latest in a series of happy endings. Of 26 dogs seized by the New Forest District Council dog warden service between February 1 and February 22, 17 have been reunited with her owners.

ShareThis